Questions :P

[griffin90909012]

Well. You saw the title, so here;

1. would it be better to be an sd before i applyed for "Mod"?

2.In what situations would i need to report a player?

3.Is it "Legal" To pay for god weapons? Like, a lot of money?

4.If someone were to get banned, and i knew that person was "inosent" And the person who banned the other person did not beleive me, which topic should i do a +New topic on to explain how that person is inosent?

5.Am i spelling "inosent" right?

6.Where do tacoz come from????!!!??

[Mcmanaway1]

griffin90909012 wrote:Well. You saw the title, so here;

1. would it be better to be an sd before i applyed for "Mod"?

2.In what situations would i need to report a player?

3.Is it "Legal" To pay for god weapons? Like, a lot of money?

4.If someone were to get banned, and i knew that person was "inosent" And the person who banned the other person did not beleive me, which topic should i do a +New topic on to explain how that person is inosent?

5.Am i spelling "inosent" right?

6.Where do tacoz come from????!!!??

1. No you do not need to be SD before getting Moderator, For example Challenger410 and Metazard were both Moderators without donating at all.

2. I would report a player if no staff are online or easily contactable at the time, It would be awesome if people left screenshots of what the person has done with either hawkeye or a screenshot of someone breaking the rules in front of you.

3. It is not "Legal" to sell or buy god weapons, back in earlier times; 2011 - 2012 you could. However so many people had god weapons new people couldn't start on the server as people would kill them with god items and the new guys couldn't stand a chance. This also left issues where people who wanted to go completely legit couldn't stand a chance against someone with god items. So banning the sale or purchase of them was a way to make everyone equal in a sense, however we couldn't remove the older stuff from players due to it being unfair on them who purchased them before, so they are allowed to have the ones they had 'before' the ban.

4. If they write it on their ban appeal, however if they don't have one I have no clue. Someone else like Meta, Chall, Kittens or Inspiron would have to answer that one.

5. It's spelt innocent.

6. This explains where Tacos come from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taco


Hopefully I have answered all of your questions, if you have any other questions I would be happy to answer you!

[griffin90909012]

Should i click on that link? I feel like it leads to a virus

[Mcmanaway1]

griffin90909012 wrote:Should i click on that link? I feel like it leads to a virus

Have you never heard of Wikipedia?

[zombielover99]

Mcmanaway1 wrote:

griffin90909012 wrote:Should i click on that link? I feel like it leads to a virus

Have you never heard of Wikipedia?

LOL

[Metazard]

griffin90909012 wrote:
4.If someone were to get banned, and i knew that person was "inosent" And the person who banned the other person did not beleive me, which topic should i do a +New topic on to explain how that person is inosent?

Make a new topic and provide to following:


An explanation to other as to what the person was accused of.

What actually happened

Statements from others

Screenshots

Proof.