2015-01-16, 10:51 AM
Another suggestion is, don't make false quotes. It can really change the story's view point. For example, when you said I kept the diamonds as evidence of you helping me, I had said nothing of that. For one, I had warned you spawning in items no matter the size nor item it is, is illegal. I kept the diamonds to prove that you had spawned in a total of 24 and told the VIP-Obsidian donors whom were on at the time. These donors were: Deathworlds and Epic_dude24(I might of messed up Epic's name)
They warned you not to do it again or they will have to take action. After hearing this you became furious but you were interrupted by another player, as deathworlds called "Widmer" from looking at your post named "Commission" I can conclude that Widmer and you are both indeed xXRipley_sanXx and that this cousin stuff isn't true. But the point being, you have lied to the community for absolutely no reason, but to top it off you have ADMITTED to spawning in items for DarkGamer while on Ripley. Deathworlds had said that "We jail accounts not players" was applied to this situation. From that he meant that in a way Ripley giving you, DarkGamer, items is not allowed since you are providing items to a non-item spawning rank.
The picture will be provided below, even if he doesn't directly say it, it is pretty much applied. I am not a lawyer in any way, shape or form, nor do I intend to be. I am here to put my statement in on how one-sided this post from DarkGamer or Ripley, I'm not sure which one is his original account.
They warned you not to do it again or they will have to take action. After hearing this you became furious but you were interrupted by another player, as deathworlds called "Widmer" from looking at your post named "Commission" I can conclude that Widmer and you are both indeed xXRipley_sanXx and that this cousin stuff isn't true. But the point being, you have lied to the community for absolutely no reason, but to top it off you have ADMITTED to spawning in items for DarkGamer while on Ripley. Deathworlds had said that "We jail accounts not players" was applied to this situation. From that he meant that in a way Ripley giving you, DarkGamer, items is not allowed since you are providing items to a non-item spawning rank.
The picture will be provided below, even if he doesn't directly say it, it is pretty much applied. I am not a lawyer in any way, shape or form, nor do I intend to be. I am here to put my statement in on how one-sided this post from DarkGamer or Ripley, I'm not sure which one is his original account.