Can I get a quick question answered? :3

[Mcmanaway1]

inspironwins wrote:however I'm glad you are. Please let us know any news.

Husk
http://enterpriseminecraft.com/husk

Sponge
http://www.spongepowered.org/

Both are currently unavailable. Husk devs claim that it may run 'some' bukkit plugins, however with DMCA they might have to avoid that.

Sponge-API is currently the most supported, with the creators of World edit/World guard being the lead developers on the project.

me4502 (Sponge-API Developer) wrote:Firstly, as Sponge is built on forge, a build of forge for 1.8 is required to even start working on an implementation (The runnable server) of the Sponge project.

.
However it will not run Bukkit plugins straight out of the box, and will need to be ported to Sponge API to avoid DMCA (As of October 3rd, the Lead Dev of Sponge-API has confirmed that 400 plugin developers have confirmed they are willing to port their project to the new Sponge-API plugin system).

Sponge-API Plan-sheet

Sponge.PNG (89.54 KiB) Viewed 57 times

However it sounds as if a few plugin developers are planning to make a plugin called Pore.
Pore aims to bridge Bukkit plugins into Sponge without server owners needing to wait, or go out of there wait and develop a port for plugins to run on a Sponge API server.

http://www.reddit.com/r/spongeproject/comments/2frfaa/pore_a_bridge_for_bukkit_and_sponge/

However because these are both new projects, it is going to take awhile as they will have to build their way up from the bottom to have a server that will be able to support plugins like Bukkit used too.

Disclaimer:
As I am just using my translation of what I have seen from these sites (Which may be outdated sources), I may have left a few errors in my compressed discussion on these two Bukkit replacements I have found.