Mute qu3sti0onmark

[1258933]

So I talked to Mwlm about the whole shebang and honestly when I talk to Qu3 im at a very high doubt that they wont match. Why its just me.

I know that Qu3 and Mwlm are BOTH very smart. Why doesn't he just post proof if he does this whole thing could've and could be taken care of.

This doesn't just go for Mwlm but for anyone that has the power to jail/mute think is this going to come right back at me and is someone going to ask for proof and 2 or 3 pieces of why I did what I did. Was this necessary, was this a good amount of time, am I acting like a five year old raging at a game? If you can answer them solidly then wow you did good if not then sorry you need to learn more.

Now a lot of you are like dude come on you don't apply those to yourself and honestly I do now, I still have a lot to learn but if I can apply those rules to myself then wow ill be golden.

You might say well yeah this was all necessary, but think is it minor, if its greif or something like what happened on this thread, then yeah give them a warning then a good refresher.

This took me awhile to figure out but I have, and what it is, is that you have jail/mute for a good reason but not to go all you said "Hi" now I'm going to jail you. (I never did that though)

-1258933

[griffin90909012]

Man, i love that speech man :3 Also i do agree with Jamourous and 1258933 That a simple warning would have done. And if Questionmark wasn't on to see the warning, then mail him. Don't just ban him (i'm pretty sure Mwml would not of banned him, unless he was repeatedly being jailed and acting up IN jail) or jail him. And if he has been repeating his actions on Mctopia over and over again, that's when you should jail him on the spot ( not for saying "i hate you" or anything small like that, again i know Mwml wouldn't of done that ).







___/GryphMyster\___

[Jamourous]

1258933 wrote:Do I really have to quote this? Just read it

I can agree with 125. We have had our problems, but you have started to mature up. Well done.

This is borderline 'old' 125 stuff right here. Jailing for something that really didn't deserve the effort. You have the power, we know. No need to use it unnecessarily... we already know what it does.

[1258933]

Jamourous wrote:

1258933 wrote:Do I really have to quote this? Just read it

I can agree with 125. We have had our problems, but you have started to mature up. Well done.

This is borderline 'old' 125 stuff right here. Jailing for something that really didn't deserve the effort. You have the power, we know. No need to use it unnecessarily... we already know what it does.

Strong very strong. I feel the force with in you.

[Lord_Nick]

Honestly, this post needs proof. I know many times in the past I've argued with Mwlm and he can really change to story to his likings. Besides the rule is "no excessive cussing" not "no cussing" the keyword there was excessive meaning in large amounts.

[griffin90909012]

What happens if mwml didn't get proof? Will he get in "trouble" for not getting proof? I'm just wondering because i would believe this would happen. Only because i haven't been on the server once when QuestionMark has NOT cussed.

[Metazard]

griffin90909012 wrote:What happens if mwml didn't get proof? Will he get in "trouble" for not getting proof? I'm just wondering because i would believe this would happen. Only because i haven't been on the server once when QuestionMark has NOT cussed.

Possibly jail perms revoked

[griffin90909012]

Oh. Ok.