Rule?

[qtface]

So assuming by how many donors do it, selling spawned items to members is allowed as long as there is a fair price right? It seems like most donors don't know how to judge a correct price for items and are giving items away for practically nothing. I just witnessed someone try to sell a beacon for 3 diamonds. Beacons can't even be obtained legitimately anymore because withers are disabled, so why would such a valuable item sell for such a low price? What is even more sad is a member who was online at the time offered the buyer one of her ten beacons that she "didn't even need" anymore for free. Although the economy is already messed up, allowing spawning ranks to throw in even more diamonds and iron into the mix isn't helping.

If selling items to non-spawning ranks if you have /i was against the rules, it wouldn't prevent every transaction but it would stop a lot of it.

[icetea4meplz]

Sorry qtee, I didn't know that there was a rule about that. Ill try (when I am buying from a donater) to make the offer, not let the donater make it. " title="Very Happy">

[qtface]

Well there isn't really rule, Im just suggesting they make one.

[Lord_Nick]

That would be a stupid rule, people would end up giving spawned items to their friends more often, since they can't sell them. There is a rule about selling them for too cheap, many people have gotten in trouble by doing this in the past.

[qtface]

Let's play a game called count the positive things Nick has commented on my posts within the last few months, oh wait, there are none because he's a obsessive little jerk.

It wouldn't be a stupid rule, and your logic is flawed. If someone is going to follow one rule, wouldn't you assume they would follow the other rule just the same?

[Lord_Nick]

qtface wrote:Let's play a game called count the positive things Nick has commented on my posts within the last few months, oh wait, there are none because he's a obsessive little jerk.

It wouldn't be a stupid rule, and your logic is flawed. If someone is going to follow one rule, wouldn't you assume they would follow the other rule just the same?

You have to remember, people would want certain items that only can be spawned in, if they can't buy it, they'll just convince a friend to give it to them.

[Lord_Nick]

qtface wrote:Let's play a game called count the positive things Nick has commented on my posts within the last few months, oh wait, there are none because he's a obsessive little jerk.

It wouldn't be a stupid rule, and your logic is flawed. If someone is going to follow one rule, wouldn't you assume they would follow the other rule just the same?

Also, I could say the same for you, on none of my posts have you commented positively, instead every time I post something and you respond no matter the situation, its negative. "You've already stated your opinion you don't have to repeat yourself

Unjailed because person affected (icetea4meplz) requested it" If you complain about me doing it, don't do it yourself.

[qtface]

I don't understand what you are talking about. That is a reply to a reply you posted on my post? What you quoted wasn't on your own individual post, it was on mine?

[Lord_Nick]

O.o I didn't do that, seems like a bug.

[icetea4meplz]

Wasn't this post about a rule? just wondering, this is in fact the general discussion so you guys can do whatever you want on this post " title="Smile">